Social media framework for discussion

I’ve had count­less con­ver­sa­tions with com­pa­nies and inter­ac­tive agen­cies on the sig­nif­i­cance of social media and the impact it will have on busi­nesses’ mar­ket­ing, PR and prod­uct devel­op­ment activ­i­ties and processes. From these con­ver­sa­tions and from my own expe­ri­ence using, teach­ing, con­sult­ing and work­ing with com­pa­nies and non-profits on social media ini­tia­tives and pro­grams, I’ve devel­oped an approach to frame the con­ver­sa­tion, as described below. Please see foot­notes for credit to Tara Hunt and Yvette Ferry. 1 2

The Premise for Social Media

An increas­ing num­ber of com­pa­nies are now dip­ping their toes into social media, but many are still unsure what it is and how to imple­ment it for their cus­tomer base and profitability.

Social media sets itself apart from pre­vi­ous types of media in terms of the engage­ment and com­mit­ment of peo­ple. In main­stream media and adver­tis­ing, peo­ple were rel­e­gated to the role of an anony­mous and pas­sive audi­ence. This par­a­digm is no longer work­ing. Today, the com­mu­nity is every­thing, and more and more com­pa­nies are rec­og­niz­ing their need to change with the times.

In a social media set­ting, peo­ple become active and inter­ac­tive by express­ing their opin­ion on what they’re view­ing, by hav­ing the abil­ity to alter con­tent, and by cre­at­ing their own con­tent to be viewed by oth­ers. The means of pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and story-telling are mul­ti­plied while costs are low­ered, grant­ing mil­lions of peo­ple the pos­si­bil­ity to pro­duce their own indi­vid­u­al­is­tic con­tent. The result is a new, more engaged type of user. This engage­ment is fur­ther increased when the user may cre­ate an iden­tity and make explicit their social con­nec­tions. All of this trans­lates into increased effi­ciency, use and, ulti­mately, vol­ume of busi­ness for appro­pri­ately engaged companies.

A Frame­work for Social Media Integration

Inte­grat­ing new media into com­pa­nies’ busi­ness prac­tices and cul­ture involves con­cen­trat­ing on three areas: com­mu­ni­ca­tion, user expe­ri­ence, and prod­uct devel­op­ment. In large part, each area depends upon the oth­ers for res­o­nance, coher­ence and rein­force­ment. You can increase con­ver­sion and reten­tion from adver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing (and viral) cam­paigns by devel­op­ing and enhanc­ing your com­mu­ni­ca­tions, web­site usabil­ity, and prod­uct fea­tures, by select­ing and inte­grat­ing the appro­pri­ate social media for your mar­kets and by opti­miz­ing the use of these media.

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion

Effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion entails devel­op­ing a holis­tic mar­ket­ing approach that works with and not against community-building efforts. Suc­cess­ful online com­pa­nies are gen­er­ally those that lis­ten and respond to their cus­tomers, a sim­ple premise that can be remark­ably dif­fi­cult to exe­cute. Most com­pa­nies strug­gle to lis­ten to and “hear” what their cus­tomers are say­ing, and this unin­ten­tional deaf­ness affects their bot­tom lines. You can cre­ate com­mu­ni­ca­tion strate­gies for user engage­ment, as well as inter­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tion and imple­men­ta­tion processes that both reflect and impact com­mu­nity and prod­uct devel­op­ment. In addi­tion, you can develop social-network out­reach strate­gies, inte­grate new media into cor­po­rate out­reach efforts and opti­mize search-engine results in order to be more find­able by your cus­tomer base. This effort involves devel­op­ing an out­reach strat­egy to iden­tify and estab­lish rela­tion­ships with your users and also to cre­ate spaces in which your com­mu­ni­ties may inter­act, using new media.

User Expe­ri­ence

The ways in which your com­pany inter­acts with your web­site users is crit­i­cal to their expe­ri­ence. The cohe­sive­ness of the com­mu­nity you build is largely depen­dent on the qual­ity of the inter­ac­tion your users have at your web­sites, and the com­mu­nity man­age­ment resources you make avail­able. This means cre­at­ing web­sites with social attrib­utes and affor­dances that encour­age users to come back, because they can inter­act with your com­pany and also with each other. It also implies cre­at­ing dash­boards, busi­ness processes and empow­er­ing (or hir­ing) employ­ees to per­form com­mu­nity man­age­ment, ombuds­man and relationship-building activ­i­ties. You can lay the foun­da­tion for growth and opti­mize the results from adver­tis­ing, direct mar­ket­ing, and viral cam­paigns by devel­op­ing opti­mized user expe­ri­ences, using new media and social networks.

Prod­uct Development

Prod­uct devel­op­ment entails cre­at­ing ser­vices and prod­ucts based on the use and desires of users and cus­tomers. Using spe­cific met­rics and base­lines for mea­sur­ing user engage­ment and growth, you can hear what your cus­tomers are say­ing and assess the ways in which they are using your prod­ucts, ser­vices and web­sites. You can use data and develop inter­nal busi­ness processes to pro­to­type, test and cre­ate prod­ucts and ser­vices that are respon­sive to the stated and implicit needs of your cus­tomers and user bases.

Finally, mon­i­tor­ing your prod­ucts, brands and rep­u­ta­tions is impor­tant to your own ongo­ing suc­cess and you can track and man­age the rep­u­ta­tion of com­pa­nies, brands, and prod­ucts, using new media.

Over­all, you may find that social media is more timely, effi­cient, and cost-effective than other approaches.

What do you think? How do you approach social media issues with your com­pany or clients? What frame­works do you use for dis­cus­sion?

  1. Credit is due to Tara Hunt, who seeded my think­ing on this, although this post is not nec­es­sar­ily reflec­tive of her views. Please read her excel­lent blog for more on Social Media Strat­egy and com­mu­nity man­age­ment.
  2. Yvette Ferry deserves credit for help­ing me orga­nize these thoughts and moti­vat­ing me to put pen to paper. She is a free­lance writer you should con­sider hir­ing for your projects.
 


  • Michael,

    Indeed. I think conditions are different enough from the web 1.0 to avoid a similar fate. More people are online; more have broadband; people have climbed up the experience ladder; websites are developed according to standards and best pratices; and technology, hosting, and hiring costs have gone down. Nonetheless, some very big threats remain on the horizon that could invalidate the above (including ending Net Neutrality).

    I agree with your points about the agency-client relationship with respect to social media. Agencies need to show results in order to justify budgets. I also agree with Joel's conclusions, as evidenced by his "enlightening moments." I don't dispute any of that, and I think part of the solution is talking about social media without referring to social media. I often use new media, when talking to news organizations and colleges.

    That being said, I think part of it is also creating a new framework for discussion, to escape the "campaign" and short-term results mentality. This is a new budget item. Perhaps resources need to be shifted from elsewhere to fill this budget. Perhaps a reorganization needs to happen done, to better align the organization with the new processes inherent to participating in social media. Either way, this is not business as usual, and acting like it is could lead to some unwanted (and sometimes well-publicized) consequences.

    Finally, there is some cost in not participating in new media, which could be more clearly described to clients.
  • I would only add to Ed's comments re the agencies "wanting to profit" out of social media, first that "agencies" is a very broad brushtroke ... there are large global agencies and there are three-person boutique agencies, and among them all there are some very savvy social media practitioners and PR bloggers who are sensitive to the need not to do with Web 2.0 what was previously done with Web 1.0.

    Secondly, if we can put aside the dirty word "profit" for a moment, it would be helpful to consider that agencies and their clients -- precisely because they function in the world of business in our western market economies (which we may or may not like, but it's what we have to work with!) -- have to be concerned that they get a return for their investment of energy and resources on social media. Ultimately for clients, this means that social media has to contribute to their ability to stay in the black while doing business ... otherwise they would go broke and everyone is out of a job, right? To stay in the black, they have to have transactions with buyers of their goods and services. So, ultimately, they are always concerned that their investment of time and resources in social media helps to generate those transactions. And, the clients' concerns have to be the agency's concerns, as well. It's not all about the transaction ... but a lot of it is!

    To further the discussion, I would point you to my friend Joel Postman's blog post on the subject at: http://blogs.eastwick.com/mediaartifacts/2007/08/02/get-that-social-media-guy-outta-here
  • Ed, remember how we used to get viral emails, with photos and powerpoint attachments of funny stuff? Well, that's mostly gone for me (but my parents still get viral email from their friends), now that I'm on Facebook. Those viral videos now get sent through FunWall and SuperWall. But I think that even there some of the novelty is gone and I'm seeing less volume of viral stuff being sent.

    Viral blocking? Interesting. I think that as lifestreaming services like SocialThing, FriendFeed, Jaiku, Tumblr and Facebook's own mini-feed catch on, there's less need to "push" stuff to your friends. Discovery occurs as you login and browse what your friends have been up to. I think this will slow down the viral uptake on most content, while extraordinary viral stuff will always be pushed. So over the long run, lifestreams raise the bar higher for viral content. That, plus the fact that we know how to find viral stuff: just look at what's being most viewed on YouTube and you've quickly caught up about what's popular for your watercooler talks with coworkers.
  • Thanks, Linda, I had checked out your site about brand monitoring services and I'd like to talk to you at some point about that.

    Michael, Henriette, I've been so busy this past month; thanks for you comments.

    Ed, thanks for stopping by and for your comments. This post is not necessarily written for the layman, and is more directed at the interactive agencies with whom I've been having conversations. Many times the focus is on "how do we create viral campaigns", whereas social media is really fundamentally about something else. In my post, I create a framework for discussing how to use social media beyond just the viral campaign.

    However, the agency-client relationship is so often about the next "campaign," and agencies feel the pressure to bring back charts that show website visits are spiking up with each campaign. Clients are looking to go beyond advertising, and agencies are trying to crack the code of social media in order to present something new to the client. Because they are in campaign mode, they naturally want to create viral stuff. This is how companies and agencies get targeted by the hucksters you mention. For example, check out this TechCrunch post about questionable techniques for seeding viral campaigns:
    http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/22/the-secret-strategies-behind-many-viral-videos/
  • That's an interesting narrative. There's tension between the premise of social media and the agencies who try to profit from it.

    It sounds like agencies are interested in one-night stands whereas companies should be more interested in long-term relationships. (A metaphor that shines new light on the word "viral".)

    Is the agency focus on virulence hurting the social web?

    I would say yes. And your experiences point to storm clouds on the horizon for Web 2.0. Automatic viral campaign blocking will become a feature.
  • This was difficult to read. It lacks the passion you convey when presenting this type of information live. A video or slide show with audio might be better.

    Language, how you talk to your customers, is an important part of social media as well.

    Maybe a narrative would help. Talk specifically about how your "countless conversations" and experience informed this post. I get the impression that you've had some difficulty selling social media to an "unsure" audience. Isn't that why we need a framework like this? Instead of just saying they're unsure, say, "So I was talking to the public relations guy at a company recently and he asked me, 'So what's up with all this social media stuff.' So I asked him to describe it and he said, 'I don't know, like blogs?'" And then you make up some imaginary exchange between you and him during which you describe your framework.

    One of the most salient points I've heard you make was during a recent presentation at UM. You showed a screenshot of an unscrupulous website selling social media tools for ridiculous amounts. "We'll make you a blog for $2000" and stuff like that. That says a lot. It's one thing to be unsure, but quite another to be a naive target for hucksters. The assurance that comes from understanding what social media is gets your foot in the door. The benefits to your bottom-line come soon after.

    That slide was memorable. From that specific example I can infer your general point (or imagine a good one and attribute it to you). This post is missing the "$2000 blog".
  • There are some really nice tips in your post. I like how you link social media and product development. Many companies do not take full advantage of the wealth of wisdom that their customers have to offer about potential markets--and many customers don't even recognise the wisdom that they offer so brilliantly. It takes uniting both customer and producer online to create some really innovative markets.
    I've also blogged about this for my company, which offers some social media consulting to aid in the use of our software.
  • Alex, nice post! Especially like your emphasis on "engagement" and "appropriateness" ... appropriate social media strategies for engaging your community.

    Social media is certainly not a "hard science" and as it evolves taking the time to find the right social media platform or channel does seem critical to success.

    I'm glad somebody with your experience in community building is emphasizing this, inviting discussion as well as providing guideposts to others moving along the same path.
  • awesome post Alex I love when people put it all into framework - I will definetly be able to work around it at ToothlessTiger =)
  • Right. It's useful to make an "audit" of where the client is, in order to establish a baseline from which to measure quantitative as well qualitative results. If the bottom line is the only concern, though, there's a risk the social media initiatives get axed before they've had a chance to make a difference. Results are hardly ever immediate and programs require continuous tweaking and improvement.
  • freerangemom
    Keeping the client focusing back on what is the bottom line for their business is the key, I think. Lots of people think social media is a good idea, but it's also an investment in time and money. Keeping clear objectives for what you are trying to accomplish is critical. It's easy to get blown about the social media landscape and suck up a lot of time with no results to your bottom line. Does everyone need a blog or a facebook site? I'd say, no, until you can prove otherwise.
blog comments powered by Disqus