Alex de Carvalho


Social media framework for discussion

by Alex. Average Reading Time: about 4 minutes.

I’ve had count­less con­ver­sa­tions with com­pa­nies and inter­ac­tive agen­cies on the sig­nif­i­cance of social media and the impact it will have on busi­nesses’ mar­ket­ing, PR and prod­uct devel­op­ment activ­i­ties and processes. From these con­ver­sa­tions and from my own expe­ri­ence using, teach­ing, con­sult­ing and work­ing with com­pa­nies and non-profits on social media ini­tia­tives and pro­grams, I’ve devel­oped an approach to frame the con­ver­sa­tion, as described below. Please see foot­notes for credit to Tara Hunt and Yvette Ferry. [1. Credit is due to Tara Hunt, who seeded my think­ing on this, although this post is not nec­es­sar­ily reflec­tive of her views. Please read her excel­lent blog for more on Social Media Strat­egy and com­mu­nity man­age­ment.] [2. Yvette Ferry deserves credit for help­ing me orga­nize these thoughts and moti­vat­ing me to put pen to paper. She is a free­lance writer you should con­sider hir­ing for your projects.]

The Premise for Social Media

An increas­ing num­ber of com­pa­nies are now dip­ping their toes into social media, but many are still unsure what it is and how to imple­ment it for their cus­tomer base and profitability.

Social media sets itself apart from pre­vi­ous types of media in terms of the engage­ment and com­mit­ment of peo­ple. In main­stream media and adver­tis­ing, peo­ple were rel­e­gated to the role of an anony­mous and pas­sive audi­ence. This par­a­digm is no longer work­ing. Today, the com­mu­nity is every­thing, and more and more com­pa­nies are rec­og­niz­ing their need to change with the times.

In a social media set­ting, peo­ple become active and inter­ac­tive by express­ing their opin­ion on what they’re view­ing, by hav­ing the abil­ity to alter con­tent, and by cre­at­ing their own con­tent to be viewed by oth­ers. The means of pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and story-telling are mul­ti­plied while costs are low­ered, grant­ing mil­lions of peo­ple the pos­si­bil­ity to pro­duce their own indi­vid­u­al­is­tic con­tent. The result is a new, more engaged type of user. This engage­ment is fur­ther increased when the user may cre­ate an iden­tity and make explicit their social con­nec­tions. All of this trans­lates into increased effi­ciency, use and, ulti­mately, vol­ume of busi­ness for appro­pri­ately engaged companies.

A Frame­work for Social Media Integration

Inte­grat­ing new media into com­pa­nies’ busi­ness prac­tices and cul­ture involves con­cen­trat­ing on three areas: com­mu­ni­ca­tion, user expe­ri­ence, and prod­uct devel­op­ment. In large part, each area depends upon the oth­ers for res­o­nance, coher­ence and rein­force­ment. You can increase con­ver­sion and reten­tion from adver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing (and viral) cam­paigns by devel­op­ing and enhanc­ing your com­mu­ni­ca­tions, web­site usabil­ity, and prod­uct fea­tures, by select­ing and inte­grat­ing the appro­pri­ate social media for your mar­kets and by opti­miz­ing the use of these media.

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion

Effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion entails devel­op­ing a holis­tic mar­ket­ing approach that works with and not against community-building efforts. Suc­cess­ful online com­pa­nies are gen­er­ally those that lis­ten and respond to their cus­tomers, a sim­ple premise that can be remark­ably dif­fi­cult to exe­cute. Most com­pa­nies strug­gle to lis­ten to and “hear” what their cus­tomers are say­ing, and this unin­ten­tional deaf­ness affects their bot­tom lines. You can cre­ate com­mu­ni­ca­tion strate­gies for user engage­ment, as well as inter­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tion and imple­men­ta­tion processes that both reflect and impact com­mu­nity and prod­uct devel­op­ment. In addi­tion, you can develop social-network out­reach strate­gies, inte­grate new media into cor­po­rate out­reach efforts and opti­mize search-engine results in order to be more find­able by your cus­tomer base. This effort involves devel­op­ing an out­reach strat­egy to iden­tify and estab­lish rela­tion­ships with your users and also to cre­ate spaces in which your com­mu­ni­ties may inter­act, using new media.

User Expe­ri­ence

The ways in which your com­pany inter­acts with your web­site users is crit­i­cal to their expe­ri­ence. The cohe­sive­ness of the com­mu­nity you build is largely depen­dent on the qual­ity of the inter­ac­tion your users have at your web­sites, and the com­mu­nity man­age­ment resources you make avail­able. This means cre­at­ing web­sites with social attrib­utes and affor­dances that encour­age users to come back, because they can inter­act with your com­pany and also with each other. It also implies cre­at­ing dash­boards, busi­ness processes and empow­er­ing (or hir­ing) employ­ees to per­form com­mu­nity man­age­ment, ombuds­man and relationship-building activ­i­ties. You can lay the foun­da­tion for growth and opti­mize the results from adver­tis­ing, direct mar­ket­ing, and viral cam­paigns by devel­op­ing opti­mized user expe­ri­ences, using new media and social networks.

Prod­uct Development

Prod­uct devel­op­ment entails cre­at­ing ser­vices and prod­ucts based on the use and desires of users and cus­tomers. Using spe­cific met­rics and base­lines for mea­sur­ing user engage­ment and growth, you can hear what your cus­tomers are say­ing and assess the ways in which they are using your prod­ucts, ser­vices and web­sites. You can use data and develop inter­nal busi­ness processes to pro­to­type, test and cre­ate prod­ucts and ser­vices that are respon­sive to the stated and implicit needs of your cus­tomers and user bases.

Finally, mon­i­tor­ing your prod­ucts, brands and rep­u­ta­tions is impor­tant to your own ongo­ing suc­cess and you can track and man­age the rep­u­ta­tion of com­pa­nies, brands, and prod­ucts, using new media.

Over­all, you may find that social media is more timely, effi­cient, and cost-effective than other approaches.

What do you think? How do you approach social media issues with your com­pany or clients? What frame­works do you use for discussion?

  • http://www.stumbleupon.com/refer.php?url=http%3A//alexdc.org/2008/06/a-social-media-approach.html Your page is now on StumbleUpon!

    […] Your page is on StumbleUpon […]

  • freerange­mom

    Keep­ing the client focus­ing back on what is the bot­tom line for their busi­ness is the key, I think. Lots of peo­ple think social media is a good idea, but it’s also an invest­ment in time and money. Keep­ing clear objec­tives for what you are try­ing to accom­plish is crit­i­cal. It’s easy to get blown about the social media land­scape and suck up a lot of time with no results to your bot­tom line. Does every­one need a blog or a face­book site? I’d say, no, until you can prove otherwise.

  • http://alexdc.org Alex de Carvalho

    Right. It’s use­ful to make an “audit” of where the client is, in order to estab­lish a base­line from which to mea­sure quan­ti­ta­tive as well qual­i­ta­tive results. If the bot­tom line is the only con­cern, though, there’s a risk the social media ini­tia­tives get axed before they’ve had a chance to make a dif­fer­ence. Results are hardly ever imme­di­ate and pro­grams require con­tin­u­ous tweak­ing and improvement.

  • http://www.toothlesstiger.com Hen­ri­ette Weber Andersen

    awe­some post Alex I love when peo­ple put it all into frame­work — I will definetly be able to work around it at ToothlessTiger =)

  • http://mediamindshare.wordpress.com Michael Tange­man

    Alex, nice post! Espe­cially like your empha­sis on “engage­ment” and “appro­pri­ate­ness” … appro­pri­ate social media strate­gies for engag­ing your community.

    Social media is cer­tainly not a “hard sci­ence” and as it evolves tak­ing the time to find the right social media plat­form or chan­nel does seem crit­i­cal to success.

    I’m glad some­body with your expe­ri­ence in com­mu­nity build­ing is empha­siz­ing this, invit­ing dis­cus­sion as well as pro­vid­ing guide­posts to oth­ers mov­ing along the same path.

  • http://www.attentio.com/blog/ Linda Mar­garet

    There are some really nice tips in your post. I like how you link social media and prod­uct devel­op­ment. Many com­pa­nies do not take full advan­tage of the wealth of wis­dom that their cus­tomers have to offer about poten­tial markets–and many cus­tomers don’t even recog­nise the wis­dom that they offer so bril­liantly. It takes unit­ing both cus­tomer and pro­ducer online to cre­ate some really inno­v­a­tive mar­kets.
    I’ve also blogged about this for my com­pany, which offers some social media con­sult­ing to aid in the use of our software.

  • http://www.fastfwdinnovation.com/2008/06/19/my-delicious/links-for-2008-06-19/ links for 2008-06-19 — Fast.Fwd.Innov@tion

    […] Social media frame­work for dis­cus­sion | alex de car­valho Great post from Alex de Car­valho regard­ing what’s the best way to lever­age social net­works. Thank you for shar­ing. (tags: social­me­dia alexde­car­valho fast­fwdin­no­va­tion framework) […]

  • http://dev.knight.miami.edu/blogs/alexdc/2008/06/20/what-do-you-pay-attention-to/ Phe­nom­ena and Noumena » What do you pay atten­tion to?

    […] In a social media set­ting, peo­ple become active and inter­ac­tive by express­ing their opin­ion on what they’re view­ing, by hav­ing the abil­ity to alter con­tent, and by cre­at­ing their own con­tent to be viewed by oth­ers. The means of pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and story-telling are mul­ti­plied while costs are low­ered, grant­ing mil­lions of peo­ple the pos­si­bil­ity to pro­duce their own indi­vid­u­al­is­tic con­tent. The result is a new, more engaged type of user. This engage­ment is fur­ther increased when the user may cre­ate an iden­tity and make explicit their social con­nec­tions.” –from “The Premise of Social Media“ […]

  • http://www.tapio.com/2005/08/solitary_mobili.html Soli­tary Mobil­ity vs. Mobile Social­ity | alex de carvalho

    […] Social media frame­work for discussion […]

  • http://www.cyloop.com Ed Toro

    This was dif­fi­cult to read. It lacks the pas­sion you con­vey when pre­sent­ing this type of infor­ma­tion live. A video or slide show with audio might be better.

    Lan­guage, how you talk to your cus­tomers, is an impor­tant part of social media as well.

    Maybe a nar­ra­tive would help. Talk specif­i­cally about how your “count­less con­ver­sa­tions” and expe­ri­ence informed this post. I get the impres­sion that you’ve had some dif­fi­culty sell­ing social media to an “unsure” audi­ence. Isn’t that why we need a frame­work like this? Instead of just say­ing they’re unsure, say, “So I was talk­ing to the pub­lic rela­tions guy at a com­pany recently and he asked me, ‘So what’s up with all this social media stuff.’ So I asked him to describe it and he said, ‘I don’t know, like blogs?’” And then you make up some imag­i­nary exchange between you and him dur­ing which you describe your framework.

    One of the most salient points I’ve heard you make was dur­ing a recent pre­sen­ta­tion at UM. You showed a screen­shot of an unscrupu­lous web­site sell­ing social media tools for ridicu­lous amounts. “We’ll make you a blog for $2000″ and stuff like that. That says a lot. It’s one thing to be unsure, but quite another to be a naïve tar­get for huck­sters. The assur­ance that comes from under­stand­ing what social media is gets your foot in the door. The ben­e­fits to your bottom-line come soon after.

    That slide was mem­o­rable. From that spe­cific exam­ple I can infer your gen­eral point (or imag­ine a good one and attribute it to you). This post is miss­ing the “$2000 blog”.

  • http://alexdc.org Alex de Carvalho

    Thanks, Linda, I had checked out your site about brand mon­i­tor­ing ser­vices and I’d like to talk to you at some point about that.

    Michael, Hen­ri­ette, I’ve been so busy this past month; thanks for you comments.

    Ed, thanks for stop­ping by and for your com­ments. This post is not nec­es­sar­ily writ­ten for the lay­man, and is more directed at the inter­ac­tive agen­cies with whom I’ve been hav­ing con­ver­sa­tions. Many times the focus is on “how do we cre­ate viral cam­paigns”, whereas social media is really fun­da­men­tally about some­thing else. In my post, I cre­ate a frame­work for dis­cussing how to use social media beyond just the viral campaign.

    How­ever, the agency-client rela­tion­ship is so often about the next “cam­paign,” and agen­cies feel the pres­sure to bring back charts that show web­site vis­its are spik­ing up with each cam­paign. Clients are look­ing to go beyond adver­tis­ing, and agen­cies are try­ing to crack the code of social media in order to present some­thing new to the client. Because they are in cam­paign mode, they nat­u­rally want to cre­ate viral stuff. This is how com­pa­nies and agen­cies get tar­geted by the huck­sters you men­tion. For exam­ple, check out this TechCrunch post about ques­tion­able tech­niques for seed­ing viral cam­paigns:
    http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/22/the-secret-strategies-behind-many-viral-videos/

  • http://www.cyloop.com Ed Toro

    That’s an inter­est­ing nar­ra­tive. There’s ten­sion between the premise of social media and the agen­cies who try to profit from it.

    It sounds like agen­cies are inter­ested in one-night stands whereas com­pa­nies should be more inter­ested in long-term rela­tion­ships. (A metaphor that shines new light on the word “viral”.)

    Is the agency focus on vir­u­lence hurt­ing the social web?

    I would say yes. And your expe­ri­ences point to storm clouds on the hori­zon for Web 2.0. Auto­matic viral cam­paign block­ing will become a feature.

  • http://alexdc.org Alex de Carvalho

    Ed, remem­ber how we used to get viral emails, with pho­tos and pow­er­point attach­ments of funny stuff? Well, that’s mostly gone for me (but my par­ents still get viral email from their friends), now that I’m on Face­book. Those viral videos now get sent through Fun­Wall and Super­Wall. But I think that even there some of the nov­elty is gone and I’m see­ing less vol­ume of viral stuff being sent.

    Viral block­ing? Inter­est­ing. I think that as lifestream­ing ser­vices like SocialTh­ing, Friend­Feed, Jaiku, Tum­blr and Facebook’s own mini-feed catch on, there’s less need to “push” stuff to your friends. Dis­cov­ery occurs as you login and browse what your friends have been up to. I think this will slow down the viral uptake on most con­tent, while extra­or­di­nary viral stuff will always be pushed. So over the long run, lifestreams raise the bar higher for viral con­tent. That, plus the fact that we know how to find viral stuff: just look at what’s being most viewed on YouTube and you’ve quickly caught up about what’s pop­u­lar for your water­cooler talks with coworkers.

  • http://mediamindshare.wordpress.com Michael Tange­man

    I would only add to Ed’s com­ments re the agen­cies “want­ing to profit” out of social media, first that “agen­cies” is a very broad brushtroke … there are large global agen­cies and there are three-person bou­tique agen­cies, and among them all there are some very savvy social media prac­ti­tion­ers and PR blog­gers who are sen­si­tive to the need not to do with Web 2.0 what was pre­vi­ously done with Web 1.0.

    Sec­ondly, if we can put aside the dirty word “profit” for a moment, it would be help­ful to con­sider that agen­cies and their clients — pre­cisely because they func­tion in the world of busi­ness in our west­ern mar­ket economies (which we may or may not like, but it’s what we have to work with!) — have to be con­cerned that they get a return for their invest­ment of energy and resources on social media. Ulti­mately for clients, this means that social media has to con­tribute to their abil­ity to stay in the black while doing busi­ness … oth­er­wise they would go broke and every­one is out of a job, right? To stay in the black, they have to have trans­ac­tions with buy­ers of their goods and ser­vices. So, ulti­mately, they are always con­cerned that their invest­ment of time and resources in social media helps to gen­er­ate those trans­ac­tions. And, the clients’ con­cerns have to be the agency’s con­cerns, as well. It’s not all about the trans­ac­tion … but a lot of it is!

    To fur­ther the dis­cus­sion, I would point you to my friend Joel Postman’s blog post on the sub­ject at: http://blogs.eastwick.com/mediaartifacts/2007/08/02/get-that-social-media-guy-outta-here

  • http://alexdc.org/2008/07/social-media-club-forms-interim-board.html Social Media Club forms interim board | alex de carvalho

    […] to be counted among the peo­ple invited to give new impe­tus to the Social Media Club. Through con­ver­sa­tions with com­pa­nies, orga­ni­za­tions, local uni­ver­si­ties, and inter­ac­tive agen­cies, I’ve experienced […]

  • http://alexdc.org Alex de Carvalho

    Michael,

    Indeed. I think con­di­tions are dif­fer­ent enough from the web 1.0 to avoid a sim­i­lar fate. More peo­ple are online; more have broad­band; peo­ple have climbed up the expe­ri­ence lad­der; web­sites are devel­oped accord­ing to stan­dards and best prat­ices; and tech­nol­ogy, host­ing, and hir­ing costs have gone down. Nonethe­less, some very big threats remain on the hori­zon that could inval­i­date the above (includ­ing end­ing Net Neutrality).

    I agree with your points about the agency-client rela­tion­ship with respect to social media. Agen­cies need to show results in order to jus­tify bud­gets. I also agree with Joel’s con­clu­sions, as evi­denced by his “enlight­en­ing moments.” I don’t dis­pute any of that, and I think part of the solu­tion is talk­ing about social media with­out refer­ring to social media. I often use new media, when talk­ing to news orga­ni­za­tions and colleges.

    That being said, I think part of it is also cre­at­ing a new frame­work for dis­cus­sion, to escape the “cam­paign” and short-term results men­tal­ity. This is a new bud­get item. Per­haps resources need to be shifted from else­where to fill this bud­get. Per­haps a reor­ga­ni­za­tion needs to hap­pen done, to bet­ter align the orga­ni­za­tion with the new processes inher­ent to par­tic­i­pat­ing in social media. Either way, this is not busi­ness as usual, and act­ing like it is could lead to some unwanted (and some­times well-publicized) consequences.

    Finally, there is some cost in not par­tic­i­pat­ing in new media, which could be more clearly described to clients.

  • http://delicious.com/bokardo/?page=11 bokardo’s Book­marks on Delicious

    […] Social media frame­work for dis­cus­sion | alex de car­valho SAVE […]

  • http://ma.gnolia.com/people/redsoda/tags/social%20media Hen­ri­ette Weber Kristiansen’s Book­marks Tagged With “social media”

    […] Social media frame­work for dis­cus­sion | alex de carvalho […]