Implementing social media: the adoption matrix
by Alex. Average Reading Time: about 6 minutes.
Table of contents for Keys to Implementing Social Media series
- Implementing social media: the adoption matrix
- Implementing social media: brand monitoring
tl;dr: First post in a series summarizing the “5 Keys to Implementing Social Media” presentation, starting with “The Social Media Adoption Matrix“
Checkpoint Charlie, Berlin, and the pharma industry
The recent EyeForPharma eMarketing Summit 2010 was held in Berlin, a fitting place to talk about social media for the pharmaceutical industry. The Mauer Museum at Checkpoint Charlie exhibits the many ways civilians and soldiers attempted to escape from East Berlin. By air, land and sea, people tried to cross the border by every conceivable method, including light aircraft, balloons, ziplines, hidden compartments in cars, underwater propulsion, and so on. Their imaginations were limitless in breaking down that great barrier to communication, the Berlin Wall.
This was my second visit to Berlin; I love the energy and creativity with which the city reinvents itself, as it distances itself from the past. Pharmaceutical firms and regulatory agencies must also reinvent their communications practices as quicker and easier to use tools allow physicians and patients to publish to vast audiences online.
The Social Media Adoption Matrix
At the EyeForPharma conference, I presented “5 Keys to Implementing Social Media.” If you’ve been tasked with looking into social media for your company, this is a suggested framework to help you define the business case and strategy, determine resource requirements and allocation, and set internal controls and performance metrics.

Let’s start with the adoption matrix. In short, it’s a representation on how active your company and your customers are in conversations online. The horizontal axis plots how engaged your customers are about your company and related products and services; the vertical axis plots how aware your company is of the social media activity surrounding your brand, products, services, competitors, and industry. In other words, are people talking, and where do you fit in the conversation?
First quadrant: The Marketing Neanderthal
Neanderthals and modern humans were contemporaneous species, co-existing with Cro-Magnon in Europe for about 10,000 years. Despite their larger physical size and brains, Neanderthals are believed to have expired due to behavioral and cultural traits not shared by their more successful rivals.
Are your company’s marketing efforts floundering while your competitors achieve milestones online? Are you aware of your customer’s online conversations about you, if they exist? If your community is not active, do you understand the trade offs you’re making?
Most hospitals (some exceptions here: Hospital Social Network List) and educational institutions fit in this quadrant, with neither the interest nor resources to devote to researching how to develop and connect with their community online. However, they are meaningful spaces which are potentially rich with conversations.
Second quadrant: The Wise Monkeys
So you suspect your customers are engaged in conversations about your brand, products, services, or customer service online, but you’d rather turn a blind eye? Maybe only Apple can get away with that, and only while their products rock. At least they no longer sue leakers. But Internet bastions Google and Amazon paid their dues recently. Motrin too.
What about Nestlé, who was absent from the conversation, and then showed snark? Here’s a summary, from imediaconnection:
Now, by all accounts it was Greenpeace that “started it” – with the creation of a snarky viral video (more on that in a moment). Then, enter Nestle legal claiming trademark infringement and asking that the video be taken down. This resulted in a fairly coördinated protest (some have called it attack) on Nestle’s Fan Page. Then, Nestle certainly didn’t do itself any favors – with a few ham fisted responses. Helpful Safety Tip to every corporate PR / Social Media Manager: deleting comments, or whipping out the “copyright/intellectual property” justifications are the social media equivalent of “let them eat cake”.
But, here’s the interesting part, whether you believe them or not, Nestle did respond to the Greenpeace report by “assuring” everyone that they will not use Palm Oil produced by the vendor that Greenpeace is asserting. Why they aren’t doing this more vociferously on their Facebook Fan Page is something of a mystery. Greenpeace then responded that their concessions “don’t go nearly far enough”.
Their conclusion is stunning:
But I wonder if, after a few more of these types of storms, we won’t see corporate brands tighten up and kill off some of the social media channels. One thing I do know (and I’m not saying this about the Nestle case in particular) is that as practitioners we are going to have to start to call bullshit on the mob as often as we do the mobbed. Just because they’re outside some company’s walls with pitchforks doesn’t mean they’re right. Or does it?
You guessed it: corporate Wise Monkeys see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil. Check off quadrant two of the social media adoption matrix.
Third quadrant: The Prisoner; The Thinker
Ok, so you know there’s something going on, and that you might tap into the potential of finding or developing or connecting with your community online. Unfortunately, you’re held in check, a Prisoner to your company’s restrictive policies, perhaps set in place by an overzealous legal department.
For instance, how many institutions block everyone from Facebook, like the high school I graduated from (many eons ago)? Not even the school’s administration is allowed access the platform that their students are so obviously using during the schoolday on their iPhones. Or what about Lehman Toyota, where I had my car serviced last weekend? I had many hours to spare while I waited, so I brought my laptop. The dealer had three locked wi-fi systems and informed me and another customer that access was indeed restricted. Graciously, a manager offered to hook us into landlines.
To their credit, AstraZeneca is trying out different social media platforms. The Nexium Facebook page and their AZHelps Twitter account are still a far cry from community management. Of course, part of the blame sits with the FDA (see this), which has not set out social media policies for the pharmaceutical industry.
“Thank you for all the recent comments! We are in the process of reviewing and posting them. We’ll have some new discussion topics shortly and in the coming weeks.” -Nexium on Facebook
The Thinker, on the other hand, suffers from paralysis by analysis, reading a lot about social media and attending conferences, yet not taking actionnable steps. 5 Keys to Social Media outlines a clear roadmap for implementation. Which companies are over-rationalizing social media? Here’s an interesting post comparing Ford (which “gets it”) with Chrysler. There’s a lot of room for improvement, there.
Fourth quadrant: The Pioneer
Many brands across many industries are actively engaging their community online. Kudos for taking the lead and showing the way for others to follow, and case studies abound highlighting emergent best practices. Mashable and ReadWriteWeb are good places to start for regular coverage of social media successes and failures by big brands and small.
Where does your organization fit on the adoption matrix? And where do you fit?
A warm word of thanks to Brett Petersel for retweeting (@brett) this presentation many times, driving it to thousands of views in under a week. The full deck is on Slideshare:

