SXSW Live blogging: ER 2.0
by Alex. Average Reading Time: almost 5 minutes.
This is a live post from a SXSW roundtable on ER 2.0, March 14th, 2010
Hospitals and health care providers are slowly but surely using new media and social networking software for some of their primary objectives–treatment, research, education and outreach, and patient-provider communication. This presentation will feature best practices from case studies and prescribe future uses of new media in public health.
| |
Ed Bennett University of Maryland Medical Center |
| |
Aimee Roundtree University of Houston-Downtown |
Also panelling is Jen McCabe of Contagion Health.
How does this technology complicate HIPAA compliance?
There’s a saying: “Don’t say no, just say HIPAA.” There’s a lot of fear and trepidation around what might happen, but best practices are emerging from those providers who are experimenting first. For example, some have written commenting policies that protect them, and so on.
The involvement in physicians in the social space is disappointing. They have a disinclination toward transparency because of the traditional patient — physician relationship that has been ingrained since medical school.
Why are hospitals so slow to adopt social media?
Crossing into the space where patients have direct online interaction with their physician is still a long way away, because of security issues. However, when dealing with hospitals, it is a matter of showing them how much good is possible by using social technologies. We don’t remunerate doctors for interacting with patients in this way. Also, we are legally bound by regulatory bodies, and these social channels must comply with regulations as well. Twitter feeds are admissible in court.
One of the heaviest “things” to move is human resources. For example, the question of who is the person or people who are going to address “the tidal wave” of coming complaints.
The real-world experience is that 99% of comments are positive or neutral, and there are very few complaints: “the unexpected outcomes of social media for hospitals will be positive, because we’ve anticipated all the negatives” — Lee Aase, Mayo Clinic. Monitoring is the first step to understand how much is negative, how much is positive, where are the reported variances, and who is doing the talking. One of the most efficient means of communicating is to attach a face to an institution, and to add 10% to 20% personal tweeting into these accounts. Examples are Scott Monty of Ford and Frank Eliason of Comcast. By the way, it’s great to get negative feedback, because that highlights what needs to be changed. Liability poisons the environment, but fewer lawsuits arise when people treat people like people, rather than withholding information.
What are victim’s rights online?
The place to start for patient advocates is with systemic advocacy for patient rights in general, so people start to trust you over time on a case by case basis.
What are the agents of change in hospitals and who should we work with?
Understand who holds the budgets and who is involved with patient care. Understand their community engagement strategies in the real world and show them parallels online. However, understand also that it is too early to prove that social media changes behavior, so it’s challenging to legitimize these tools.
What about compatibility with hospital systems?
Hospitals use lots of systems that don’t talk to each other. Some hospitals are blocking Facebook access, for instance, whereas patients are using Facebook to talk about the hospital. The implementation of EMR is addressing this to an extent and driving a change in behavior. Vendors need to adopt open source standards and look at innovations like microsyntax and HL7 from MIT.
What about communicating with patients through mobile devices, particularly for improving the customer service experience? By the way, hospitals provide the most opaque and worst customer service experiences.
Some hospitals and surgeons are using Twitter to provide updates during an operation, after waivers are signed. This way patients’ families can be kept up to date during the hours of waiting. It’s a small but important step in customer satisfaction.
In Africa and the Philippines, social media adoption is increasing because social tools are the most inexpensive to use for communications, compared to legacy or traditional systems.
The developing world is driving innovation out of need. Maybe the answer in developed nations is to identify organizations like freelancer’s union, irobot, and others, that have an incentive to disrupt the healthcare system. Just build really awesome stuff and you will start to see behavior change and integration.
We already have a well developed social media strategy, but our challenge now is to get the physicians engaged. Is this even possible?
Hire for that. Find physicians that are already blogging. Find a leader that sets the example. Find someone that others will follow.
What about crisis communications?
If as an institution you start to communicate and to tweet, then you start to become the source of truth (rather than the media or someone else). Go through @swhealthcare’s Twitter account to understand how they responded to crisis.
One of the best ways to drive change is to demand it as the healthcare consumers we all are.
What tools are missing? What are the new trends?
One big trend is curation of health information, which is growing at an astronomical rate. Demand will never match supply, so curation is absolutely key.


Pingback: uberVU - social comments
Pingback: Tweets that mention SXSW Live blogging: ER 2.0 – alex de carvalho -- Topsy.com
Pingback: Social Media and Health Care (at SxSW) | Forum One: Internet Strategy, Social Media, User Experience and Web Site Development
Pingback: Social Media and Health Care (at SxSW) | ICTDev dot org